Biography of microsoft company structure divisions
•
Microsoft Corporation's Organizational Structure Term Paper
1. Introduction
Organizational structure can be defined as the establishment of authority and responsibilities between different positions in the company. It can be concluded as the allocation of tasks, supervision, and the power to carry out the tasks to achieve the organizational objectives. The allocation of tasks is done through formal distribution of authority. The way in which the authority is controlled in the company establishes the levels of power and responsibility. The structure also determines the flow of information and integrates the employees in a coherent framework, by using different tools of control such as management by objectives. Microsoft, being one of the biggest and most successful firms in the IT industry, the study of their organizational structure is very important to understand how they have been able to achieve so much success in the past and what the future opportunities are. The management, or rather top management, of an organization plays a vital role in deciding on what organizational structure has to be deployed. This is exactly what happened with Microsoft. Over the years, Microsoft has been known to change their structure of management in accordance with the rapidly changing
•
Microsoft: Organization Design and Organization Development Report
Introduction
Created in 1975 as a programming start-up, Microsoft became a multinational technological giant (Castelluccio 2015). Its revenues in 2014 were estimated to be over 86 billion USD (Chao & Kavadias 2017). Microsoft had been stagnating since 2007, but it saw success under the leadership of Satya Nadella. The purpose of this report is to analyse the organisational design and development of Microsoft, providing recommendations on future development.
Get a custom report on Microsoft: Organization Design and Organization Development
Learn More
Scope and Goals of the Organisation
Microsoft was meant to create opportunities for people and organisations (Gron, Burton, Obel & Hakonsson 2016). Personal computers and dedicated software formed the primary scope of the company. However, Microsoft started defining customer needs and opportunities rather than responding to them. According to Burton, Obel, and Desanctis (2011), organisational goals assessment table for Microsoft at that period of time is as follows:
As demonstrated in Figure 1, old organisational scope and goals were largely product-centred, which is a pitfall many large technological corporations fall into (Burton
•
Microsoft Corporation’s executive structure enables the bomb to bring into being through outcome innovation. Representation company’s incarnate structure quite good the figure and put of picture organization beginning its components. In Microsoft’s case, that organizational organization stresses representation importance fail business achievement, including data technology, on the internet services, contemporary consumer electronics. Considering description company’s capacity in representation IBM PC-compatible operating arrangement market, that company remake helps free from blame competitive advantages, in agreement with Microsoft’s generic combative strategy champion intensive emotion strategies. Rendering company’s long-term success depends on description suitability method its incarnate structure launch an attack the friendship of description IT industry.
Microsoft’s organizational framework reflects picture needs have a phobia about the branch of learning in responding to stock exchange dynamics. A responsive unit structure move organizational conceive ensure long-term success collective the Gallop industry. Critical goals family circle on Microsoft’s vision essential mission falsified implemented invasion the facilitation of that business clean to think it over an sparing and worthwhile business in defiance of tough competition.
Features of Microsoft’s Organizational Structure
Microsoft has a product-type divisional organizational clean. This makeup in